Personality, Individual Differences, and Intelligence

Module Project: Factor Analysis of Personality Data Part 3 Discussion
LPSY 316: Personality, Individual Differences, and Intelligence
Jimmy Petruzzi

The research was able to provide evidence the 5 factors were present, by examining the data collected from the administration and participation of the questionnaire. Through conducting a factor analysis the research supported the hypothesis, reaffirming the reliability, validity and versatility of FFM administered across cultures, through the modification of the questionnaire with the IPIP. (2014).and the correlation with the FFM and the Traits.
The research we conducted met the following criteria, according to Stevens, (2002) a participant group over 200 is required for reliability and the loading value needs to be over .162, the number of participants we had was 1006, the 5 Items we retained were above .162.
Upon examination of the research it was established that the highest factor was 1, which was unexpected. Factor 1 was the Conscientiousness trait: consciousness had each item scored >.5
The research recorded the highest number of entries for factor 2 Neuroticism, confirming from examination of the data of the factor analysis factor 2 Neuroticism as expected had the highest level of responses from participants. The research was able to establish below factor 2 Neuroticism was factor 3 Extroversion and factor 4 openness.
Consistent with the research hypothesis estimation the factor with the lowest values was factor 5: agreeableness, Taking into consideration that omission of item 9 because it was loaded onto factor 6,The following data Neuroticism receiving a high score and agreeableness a low score supported our estimation, although in contrast the high entries for consciousness disproved our initial hypothesis.
Research by McCrae & Costa, 1997 suggested the FFM could be adapted cross culturally, in different societies and continents. The research suggested the modification of the Questionnaire for the participants was successful and able to collect and provide data for the 5 factors.
According to research by Goldberg (2001) the FFM can be adapted successfully for the administration to suit the cognitive abilities of the participant’s, the research supported this hypothesis the questionnaire was successfully adapted and completed by the participants to suit the cognitive abilities participants and translated from English into Intuit language.
In addition to support our hypothesis research by Wiggins & Trapnell, 1997 suggesting the FFM has a biological base and the ability to adapt cross cultural, which was an important factor as questions had to be adapted to culturally to the Intuit participants and adapted to the Intuit language.

This following values did not correlate with different research hypothesis or our estimation around conscientiousness ,according to the statistical data on the Intuit population Usalcas, (2009) suggesting high levels of unemployment , lower levels in education graduation and higher health risks amongst the Intuit population.
Which does not correlate with research by Scepansky,& Bjornsen, (2003) identified higher levels of the personality traits conscientiousness, and openness amongst students who had who had a profound interest in continuing on to graduate education and students who planned to leave school and potentially find work , there was also a correlation between students interested in continuing their education and engagement in lessons, which suggests a correlation between personality traits.
The following statistics according to Usalcas, (2009) as specified above also did not support the following research ,according to Research by Bogg & Roberts, (2013) suggest a correlation between Conscientiousness and long term positive health, the research examines the personality trait Conscientiousness and suggests a correlation with several health conditions.
Research suggests by Poropat, (2009). Conscientiousness has a correlation with academic achievement, the participants scored high on the conscientiousness trait According to the IPIP The facets of Conscientiousness are self-efficacy, orderliness , dutifulness, achievement striving, self-discipline which was not expected by our research considering past literature on the conscientiousness trait and correlation to education and well being.
One explanation could be upon examination from a different paradigm research by Shaw, (2016) suggests emotional regulation is a component the resilience dealing with the challenges suggested the Inuit community face. The following research Ferrazzi & Krupa, (2016) take into consideration the Intuit lifestyle and the responsibility adolescents have at early age and the changing demographic in the Intuit community , involving adaptation to western society and climatic changes impacting basic survival The responsibility of an adolescent in the Intuit community, is vastly different comparatively to western society, there could I been a misunderstanding in the translation or a factor in cultural values around the participants understanding of the facets for conscientiousness.
To support this theory research by Lim & Abdullah, (2012) suggested that whilst openness and conscientiousness, did not have a direction causation in Malaysian student academic attainment. In identification of the facets associated with openness and conscientiousness a platform could be built influencing learners performance in a positive way.
The trait conscientiousness could be correlated to aspects of Intuit adolescent life involving survival,
In support of the research hypothesis Research by Laursen,Pulkkinen, & Adams, (2002) suggest a low score on the agreeableness trait correlates to poor academic performance and behavioural problems in school, suggesting higher scores on agreeableness in adulthood correlate with more stability on work and life, less maladaptive behaviour, and less likely to develop depression and alcohol problems.
The research is consistent with our research findings and hypothesis suggesting the adolescent participants scored low on a agreeableness, and other research which suggested a high depression ratio amongst the Intuit community and higher rates of unemployment amongst the Intuit community comparatively to the general Canadian population according Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. (2007c). the ratio of unemployment in Nunavut is 19.1% with men 23.0% compared with women 15.1%. The following research by Feingold, (1994); suggest women in general are more agreeable then men. According to the following research by Sackett and Walmsley, (2014) the agreeableness personality trait has a strong correlation to work performance across many sectors, this research could suggest a correlation between higher levels of employment in the Intuit community amongst women comparatively to men.
According to Usalcas, (2009 ) the Canadian unemployment rate was approx. 5.8% in 2008. Which contrasts the much higher levels of unemployment amongst the Intuit community compared to the Canadian population outside the Intuit population.
In support to our hypothesis and research findings the research expected to establish the participants scored highly neuroticism, Research by Lahey (2009) suggests neuroticism has a big impact on public health, suggesting that certain genes that correlate with neuroticism correlate with a number of mental disorders mental disorders.
Neuroticism high response supports our hypothesis and supports the following research According to Costa and McCrae( 1985), Neuroticism is a trait associated to lack of emotional control, anxiety, sadness,.
Research by Eggertson (2013) suggests a higher level of suicide amongst the intuit community which correlates to a higher level of depression, comparatively to the general Canadian population
Watson, D., & Naragon-Gainey, K. (2014). discuss how Neuroticism has the highest correlation of any of the traits to psychopathology , suggesting scores on the higher end of the Neuroticism have correlations with depression,anxiety , substance, link to health behaviours smoking and drinking, which supports our research findings around Neuroticism.

To complete the research questionnaire the participants utilised paper and black pen, future research would take into consideration using a computer and a specific software programme for practicality if the participants accidentally marked the wrong response could change it more efficiently.
The research to into consideration a study by De Fruyt, Mervielde, Hoekstra, & Rolland,(2000) demonstrating certain questions were not understood by children participating in a NEO–PI–R translated into Flemish. whilst the research questionnaire we developed took translation into consideration and provided participants support, additional research suggests the adolescents taking a test on certain words to ensure they understand and interpreted the words correctly for example one of the questions was I often feel blue, this could have been misinterpreted by the colour blue by some participants.
According to Gurven, Rueden, Massenkoff, Kaplan, & Vie (2013) Discusses how administering the FFM in a largely illiterate society in Bolivia, raising questions marks on the validity of the FFM, finding significant covariance amongst factors of the Big 5. Future research This may suggest further adaption to certain demographic which are outside the confines of urban populations and not in full time education, although a level of literacy testing would have to be established to ensure reliability ,though testing the wider demographic adolescents who do not attend school would provide additional data for the hypothesis. We produced a modified sample questionnaire which could be administered to participants not in school.
The future research also would take the following research into consideration in developing a questionnaire.Research by Morizot, (2014) discusses the potential limitations of the FFM in the Inuit suggesting the abstract focus of the FFM does not factor the ever changing Inuit and cultural diversity, which may have been a factor in the high Conscientiousness score.
According to Research by Woods & Hampson (2005) in a comparison between simplified variations and longer variations to measure the big 5,this procedure may have negotiated a more accurate score of each individual trait, though it was deemed necessary to implement for the research due to the demographic and profile of the participant’s as previously discussed, the research took into consideration, other research conducted utilising the FM, the degree of comprised reliability and validity in setting a point for the questions, prior to administering the research question’s to the participants a trial set of questions were conducted to 120 participants who met the research criteria, the validity and reliability on the shorter variation may not be as accurate as a longer test,

The implications of our research findings based on our factor analysis of the data from the participants questionnaire, as the research hypothesised we were able to identify the 25 items questionnaire had successfully measured the five factors. The factor analysis we conducted indicated 5 factors related to the IPIP-25 inventory.
The results of the questionnaire indicated that item 16 loaded onto factor 2 which was Neuroticism. Instead of the expected factor 5 which was Agreeableness. Factor 5. Agreeableness demonstrated subordinate loadings compared to the other factors on questionnaire Extraversion, Neuroticism, Openness, and Conscientiousness. The research indicated the conscientiousness results have the highest connotation amongst the participant group and Neuroticism the highest response The research suggested agreeableness had scored the lowest comparatively to the other factors
Future research may involve a longer questionnaire administered for the participation of parents or carers of the participants to examine any correlation of traits to the hypothesis, Future research adapting the questionnaire for the Intuit adolescent’s population who do not attend school. Conduct a research test and examine the Conscientiousness trait in the participants as a follow up test in a few years and compare the traits amongst adolescents in education and not education to understand the environment as a correlating factor within the personality traits

Word count: 1827
Arthurs N et al (2014) Achievement for Students Who are Persistently Absent: Missing School, Missing Out? Urban Review. Dec2014, Vol. 46 Issue 5, p860-876. 17p.
Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2013). The Case for Conscientiousness: Evidence and Implications for a Personality Trait Marker of Health and Longevity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine : A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 45(3), 278–288.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI(R) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429-456.

Ferrazzi, P., & Krupa, T. (2016). ‘Symptoms of something all around us’: Mental health, Inuit culture, and criminal justice in Arctic communities in Nunavut, Canada. Social Science & Medicine, 165159-167. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.033

Eggertson, L. (2013). Risk of suicide 40 times higher for Inuit boys. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 185(15), E701–E702.

Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 354-370.

Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. (2007c). Inuit Social Trends Series: Employment, Industry and Occupations of Inuit in Canada, 1981-2001, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Catalogue R2-455/2007E-PDF. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.),Personality Psychology in Europe, Vol. 7 (pp. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

IPIP. (2014). International personality item pool: A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality and other individual differences. Retrieved from
Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public Health Significance of Neuroticism. The American Psychologist, 64(4), 241–256.
Laursen, B., Pulkkinen, L., & Adams, R. (2002). The antecedents and correlates of agreeableness in adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 591-603
Lim, P. S., & Melissa Ng Abdullah, L. Y. (2012). Relationship between Big-five Personality Domains and Students’ Academic Achievement. Pertanika Journal Of Social Sciences & Humanities, 20(4), 973-988

Morizot, J. (2014). Construct Validity of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Big Five Personality Traits: Importance of Conceptual Breadth and Initial Validation of a Short Measure. Assessment, 21(5), 580-606. doi:10.1177/1073191114524015

Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322-338.

Sackett, P. R, Walmsley, P. T. (2014). Which Personality Attributes Are Most Important in the Workplace? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 538-551. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614543972
Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Hillsdale, NS: Erlbaum.
Usalcas, Jeannine. 2009. “The labour market in 2008.” Perspectives on Labour and Income. Vol. 10, no. 2. February. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 75-001-X.

Van de Vliert, E. (2013). Climato-economic habitats support patterns of human needs, stresses, and freedoms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(5), 465-480. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12002828
Watson, D., & Naragon-Gainey, K. (2014). Personality, Emotions, and the Emotional Disorders. Clinical Psychological Science : A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2(4), 422–442.

Woods S., & Hampson, S. (2005). Measuring the Big Five with single items using a bipolar response scale. European Journal of Personality, 19(5), 373-390

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.